In what has become the rather predictable
style of BBC News, a headline on its web site today asks the somewhat provocative
question, “How has business been affected by Brexit so far?”. The implication in the article by Dharshini
David, a BBC Economics correspondent, is that of negativity by business leaders
to leaving the EU.
Which when you think
of it for more than a second is the wrong question for him to ask for one very
obvious reason, we haven’t left the EU.
Brexit hasn’t happened.
What is
happening is not business leaders reacting to us leaving. Most sensible business leaders accepted the
will of the people and got on with getting their business ready for life
outside the EU, the single market, the customs union, the rule of the ECJ over
all they do and all the other things that make up the package countries would
have to accept if they were to join the EU today. Indeed, one business I know, within six month
of the referendum, was ready to begin trading on the WTO rules. He contacted his suppliers and customers and worked
out what would happen if the EU didn’t come up with a deal as good as WTO, a
deal free from ECJ control etc. It was actually
all relatively easy.
Their frustration
is not us leaving the EU. What these business
leaders who did the preparation can’t understand is why the government and the opposition
parties have taken so long. They believed
that the peoples vote would be respected and prepared for that. They are frustrated that MPs having asked the
people to take the decision whether to leave are now effectively over turning
it.
In other words, sensible businesses that
have prepared for leaving have done so on a false expectation. They assumed that my word is my bond. They assumed that triggering Article 50, an
Act of Parliament, which explicitly states we leave on a particular date and
move to an alternative to EU rules, was for real.
However, it looks increasingly like their effort
was a waste of time.
What really sticks
in their craw is that the very same MPs who voted to give the decision to the people
and who triggered Article 50, are now undermining the whole thing. In the real world they would be sued for
breach of contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment