Now this question is frequently addressed to me by southern
cousins because in England the people have never really had it explained to
them in the media what the Barnett formula actually is for. I suppose the easiest way to explain it is to say if you see someone in
need, you help them.
Or to put it more in
political terms, if, because of geography, it costs 10% more to treat the average
patient in Scotland, the rest of the UK will help them out.
If you don’t get the geography bit go to www.travelinescotland.com and work out how long it takes to get from Campbeltown to the nearest big general
hospital, Glasgow University Hospital, formerly known as the Southern General. I’ll save you the search time. It’s 4 hours 43 minutes.
So in order to ensure no matter where in the
UK you live you get similar levels of care, there is an adjustment in the block
grant that Scotland gets to compensate for the additional costs of providing
the same treatments in such a geographically challenging environment. And that can be reflected in many other areas that
the Barnett Formula was intended to address.
Now I know it’s not perfect. But
while Scotland remains in the UK, it’s the best we have. Indeed, being able to help each part of the UK when it was in need was a key justification given in the referendum for Scotland staying in the Union.
Now this is where it gets interesting. Scotland gets its adjusted block grant. But the settlement says that the Scottish Government
can then prioritise what it spends given situations can and do change. So we have a Scottish Government deciding that,
because of local economic situations, prescriptions should be free. But it doesn’t get any more money from Westminster
to fund it. No, it has to make cuts elsewhere
to fund it.
So the premise that England is paying for free
prescriptions is one cultured by the media in London and really rather disingenuously
doesn’t tell the whole story. No new
news there I guess!
No comments:
Post a Comment