But what did
they fight for all these years? I thought they were always fighting that
the cases of their loved ones would find its way into a Court and that a jury of
their peers would decide if the person charged was indeed guilty.
Apparently
not. They simply wanted the person in
the dock to be found guilty. What’s the
point of jury and a court if you simply get the verdict that you want.
The jury are asked, on behalf of society, to review the evidence and assess
whether or not the prosecution has indeed made the case for the guilt to be
seen as being beyond reasonable doubt. That’s how a free and fair society works.
Surely they didn’t expect that a jury
would simply rubber stamp their personal view that one individual was guilty? If
they did, then only one of two scenarios can exist. They
have been deceived by their legal council. Or they didn’t listen to their legal
council.
No comments:
Post a Comment