Can someone please tell me why Mrs May and
others keep perpetuating the myth that we can't have a free trade Brexit
because of the Irish border?
Oh, it’s
easy to understand why Remainers like Mrs May wish us to think that. But the reality is really rather
different.
Firstly, you have to
understand that not everyone on the EU set up is a raving, swivel eyed and
only out to destroy the UK. Oh yes,
there are many of them that’s true. But
let’s give credit to one man, Donald Tusk.
He is perhaps the only one in the negotiations who actually realise that
the EU and the UK are best served by a good deal. He realises, as he said to Mrs May, there are
no cherries on the cake. This was
interpreted by some as a sleight at Mrs May.
The reality was, he was just telling the truth. And nor would we want cherries as an
adornment. What we want is the substance
of the cake.
So in his pragmatic way,
last week Mr Tusk confirmed that Canada +++ is still on the table. It is an option. So why Mrs May keeps saying there is no other
option other than Chequers is beginning to sound rather silly. Yes, there are strings attached. They could
be negotiated. But substantially, it’s
a deal I think most would find acceptable.
Except the SNP who threaten to vote down any deal that comes though the
UK parliament.
Back to the border. You can get Canada +++ and retain the border
as barrier-free as it is today. The only
thing stopping it happening is the Remainer politicians like Mrs May who see it
as a way to scupper any agreement and keep us under ECJ rule.
And what does today’s border look like? Yes, the tarmac changes colour. But look closely around it. Search it on GoogleMaps. There is a complete infrastructure already in
place in the form of ANPR cameras. Does
it cause disruption? Does anyone
complain that both sides are recording details of every vehicle that crosses
the line on the tarmac? And what of the
other stuff, VAT, tax, excise and currency?
A border already exists for all these things. So no new border. The only thing needed to be added is Customs. And to help Mrs May, there is a business in London that has just done such a project, in six months, for Singapore.
So leaving the single market and the
customs union, a promise, or should I say a threat, made by David Cameron, Vince
Cable, Nick Clegg, George Osborne, Gordon Brown, Nicola Sturgeon and others for a Canada-style
FTA adds one more item: customs.
But, let’s take an independent view from Lars
Karlsson, a former director of the World Customs Organisation. He has concluded that existing computerised
customs clearing methods used across much of the world mean physical border
infrastructure is unnecessary. And from the UK? Well, the chief executive of
HMRC notes that companies currently traversing the border complete VAT returns
electronically in a way that could be applied to future customs
declarations. Additional physical
inspections by officials already happen away from the border. So the Irish Border? The only people who
think it’s a problem are those that want to stop us leaving the EU.
No comments:
Post a Comment