Two headlines to ponder. Only one of them was actually
published. Guess which.
David
Cameron's Muslim women policy 'lazy and misguided'. Or: David Cameron's Muslim women policy 'seeks to help
integrate non English speaking Muslim women into society'.
Of course, in
case you needed some help, it was the former that was the BBC headline. Well
there you are, he must be if the BBC says so.
But wait a minute,
the interesting thing is there was zero balance in the BBC coverage on its web
site. Not a single quote backing his
view. And yet there are many who back
his view. So why are they not given equal
prominence in the article? And in a headline. Well, it’s
beyond my pay grade to speculate why.
But it does leave an uneasy taste
of censorship.
It’s nothing
new of course, kicking the messenger. Back
some 20 years ago I was sitting on a Home Office funded enquiry into why there
seemed to be no integration between indigenous and Muslim business
leaders. One of our key findings? Not enough English spoken by the Muslim
people, particularly women.
But when I suggested
we ask the Home Office to fund a pilot scheme to get more Muslims, particularly
women, learning English, I was branded a racist.
Plus ca change.
No comments:
Post a Comment