But some charities seem to want to go a bit further than
loving them. Take IFAW. I received an email from them (I can’t remember
when I gave them permission to use my email for marketing, must follow them up
on that). The disingenuous nature was breathtaking. We all know the SNP were opportunist in their
opposition in the House of Commons to bringing England into line with Scotland on
hunting laws.
With my help apparently, IFAW “managed to postpone the
threat to the Hunting Act in England and Wales.” Postpone the threat? Generously they go on: “When the UK Government recently tried to
wreck the Hunting Act for England and Wales, we heard a lot about how this
would bring the law in line with the ban across the border in Scotland.” So, an admission there that it was an
alignment that would happen.
But there is more IFAW want. "We need your help now to strengthen animal protection laws in Scotland." Which they argue will have an added bonus as this would also scupper the UK Government's claim that by amending the laws south of the border they are simply trying to bring their provisions in line with those in Scotland.
But there is more IFAW want. "We need your help now to strengthen animal protection laws in Scotland." Which they argue will have an added bonus as this would also scupper the UK Government's claim that by amending the laws south of the border they are simply trying to bring their provisions in line with those in Scotland.
I’ve heard of twisted logic before but that takes the
proverbial biscuit.
Come on IFAW, you have a good case for animal welfare. But don’t twist the facts to suit your
political agenda. When you do, people
will do what I’m about to do, de-list myself from your mailing list.
No comments:
Post a Comment